Legal Opinion

Dziubak v. Mott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1993No. C7-91-2517PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOMUANOVICH, Justice.

In 1962, the United States Supreme Court recognized the right to counsel as one of the safeguards necessary to insure fundamental human rights when it made obligatory upon the states by the Fourteenth Amendment the Sixth Amendment guarantees of the right to counsel. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1962).

[The assistance of counsel] is one of the safeguards of the Sixth Amendment deemed necessary to insure fundamental human rights of life and liberty * * *. The Sixth Amendment stands as a con*773stant admonition that if the constitutional…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Coyazo v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Mooney v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Kennedy v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Thorp v. StrigariOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Jacobi v. HolbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API