Thorp v. Strigari
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
{¶ 1} The plaintiffs-appellants, Sara Thorp, Carolyn Tyson, Gretchen Scronce, and Sara Runyun (“the Thorp appellants”), appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Louis F. Strigari, the Hamilton County Public Defender, on their claims for legal malpractice. The trial court entered judgment because Strigari was immune from suit pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2744, the Political Subdivision Tort Liability Act. In their two assignments of error, the Thorp appellants now contend that R.C. Chapter 2744’s grant of immunity violates the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mooney v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
- Paulsen v. CochranAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Siegel v. Lifecenter Organ Donor NetworkOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. CrangleOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. TownsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.