Legal Opinion

Cullingworth v. Pollard

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 18, 1960No. Record 5008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSnead, J.

The critical question in this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding by the jury that John R. Cullingworth, appellant, was a partner of Samuel R. Hubbard, Jr. in the business conducted under the name of Hubbard Used Cars.

On November 8, 1957, Leslie Pollard and Ray Pollard, trading as Beaverdam Motor Co., appellees, filed a motion for judgment against Samuel R. Hubbard, Jr. and John R. Cullingworth, individually and trading as Hubbard Used Cars, for the sum of $3,489.33, being the balance due on two automobiles which Hubbard purchased from Beaverdam Motor Co. on or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  2. Cooper v. KnoxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLean Bank v. NelsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  2. Belle Isle Co. v. Belle Isle Farm (In Re Belle Isle Farm)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
  3. Edmunds v. City of Newport NewsNewport News County Circuit Court · 1997
  4. Williamsburg West Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin/Southampton Cablevision Co.Virginia Circuit Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API