Legal Opinion

Foy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1920No. 15512PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Franklin county, Oswald, J., entered May 6,1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

Suit to recover for services performed. The complaint alleged that, between April, 1912, and December, 1916, and before and after those dates, the defendant, appellant here, was engaged in the business of furnishing light and water to the inhabitants of the city of Pasco, Washington, and that, in order so to do, it had what is called a pumping-plant located in that city; that, prior to July 9, 1912, the plaintiff’s husband had been operating this plant, at a wage of $55 per month, and on or about the last named date, defendant employed plaintiff to assist in operating the plant during that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. West Virginia Architects & Builders v. StewartWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Carlisle Packing Co. v. DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Foy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Kolmorgan v. SchallerWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Braden Winch Co. v. Surface Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Ferber v. WisenWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sullivan v. Pacific Finance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API