Legal Opinion

Smiley v. Deweese

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1891No. 103PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

The complaint in this action was in five paragraphs. The appellant, who was the defendant in the circuit court, made a motion “to require the plaintiff to separate the several causes of action stated in the first paragraph of his complaint herein, and separately number them as required by law;”

This motion was overruled by the court, and this ruling constitutes the only error assigned and discussed in this court.

The paragraph of complaint under consideration was a declaration upon a contract for the rent of a farm from appellant to appellee for the term of one year, with the privilege of two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Fisk v. TankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Mustard v. HoppessIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Richardson v. State ex rel. CrowIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Scott v. HansheerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Washington Hotel Realty Co. v. Bedford Stone & Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Johnson v. Homestead-Iron Dyke Mines Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Nordyke & Marmon Co. v. HilborgIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Brown v. GuyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Curtis Funeral Home, Inc. v. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API