Legal Opinion

Haywood v. Nye

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 24, 1998No. 2:95-cv-00216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This lawsuit arises out of the arrests of plaintiffs, James Haywood and Cynthia Haywood, in 1993. It is undisputed that the arrests of the plaintiffs were based on false information given to the individual defendants by David Tindall, a confidential informant. Plaintiffs claim that the arrests violated their constitutional rights and were motivated by racial prejudice. The plaintiffs also claim that the violations of their rights flow directly from the failure of the municipal defendants to formulate adequate policies concerning the use of confidential informants…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibbons v. LambertDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API