Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided April 24, 2025No. 8:23-cv-00268Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ROSS CHRISTENSEN, Plaintiff, 8:23CV268 vs. ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Undisclosed Expert Testimony of Dr. John Holland and Dr. John Charbonneau (Filing No. 43). Plaintiff seeks to exclude Dr. Holland and Dr. Charbonneau as Union Pacific’s expert witnesses because they are retained expert witnesses that failed to write written reports disclosing their opinions under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. BACKGROUND Plaintiff commenced…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Timothy Vanderberg v. Petco Animal Supplies StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Meyers v. National RR Passenger Corp.(Amtrak)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
  5. John Gruttemeyer v. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API