Legal Opinion
Timothy Vanderberg v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 4, 2018No. 17-2580PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRASZ, Circuit Judge.
The rules governing litigation in federal courts ensure fair and orderly proceedings free from prejudicial surprises. All litigants must disclose the identity of any expert witnesses they plan to use and, for non-retained experts such as treating physicians, they must disclose the subject matter and a summary of the facts and opinions to which the expert is expected to testify (absent a contrary stipulation or court order). Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2). In this case, plaintiff Timothy Vanderberg relied upon statements by two treating physicians as expert opinions to show that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Wilson v. Bradlees of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Wegener v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Poulis Minott v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Gary Merchant v. Corizon Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Philip Petrone v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Niazi Licensing Corporation v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- John Gruttemeyer v. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- J.T. Johnson, Jr. v. Jenna FriesenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.