Legal Opinion

Davis v. Chouteau

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.1

This is an action to recover for professional services as attorney, rendered by plaintiff to defendants between February, 1881, and August, 1883, in a suit pending in the supreme court of the United States, on appeal from the United States circuit court for the district of Minnesota. The point raised is that the evidence shows that the contract of retainer, under which the services were rendered, was made with plaintiff while he was a member of the law firm of Davis, O’Brien & Wilson, and hence was, in law, a retainer of the firm, and therefore the cause of action proved was one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Conklin v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Scrantom v. Farmers & Mechanics' BankNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Merritt v. . WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  5. Slutts v. ChafeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mason v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  2. Williams v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Budds v. FreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Braithwaite v. AikinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Anderson v. W. J. Dyer & Bro.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API