Legal Opinion

Garner v. Hudgins

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 15, 1870PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Fifth District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

The petition recites that James T. Hudgins rvas director of the Farmers’Bank of Missouri, and that on the 28th of January, 1858, the firm of Wm. Hudgins & Co., composed of defendants and said James T. Hudgins, desired to procuré a loan of- ¡§3,700 ; and for reasons set forth, the said firm, by the name of and through the position of said James T., procured said loan and used it in the firm'business, the said James T. executing his note at six months, with sureties for said sum; and it being understood when said note rvas executed that its proceeds were for the use. of the firm, and that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. . CurtissNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  2. Farmers' Bank v. BaylissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  3. Harrison v. SawtelNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  4. Higgins v. DellingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  5. Howard v. CoshowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minick v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State Ex Rel. Nelson v. HammettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Redenbaugh v. KeltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API