Howard v. Coshow
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Charles Circuit Court. The statements of Murdock were not admissible testimony against defendant without it being first shown aliunde that Murdock and defendant were combining and confederating together in the perpetration of a fraud. There is no distinction in principle between such admissions and those of an alleged partner. The partnership must first be proven, and this is never allowed to be done by the statements of the alleged partner himself.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Charles Circuit Court. The statements of Murdock were not admissible testimony against defendant without it being first shown aliunde that Murdock and defendant were combining and confederating together in the perpetration of a fraud. There is no distinction in principle between such admissions and those of an alleged partner. The partnership must first be proven, and this is never allowed to be done by the statements of the alleged partner himself. (Field & Beardslee v. Liverman, 17 Mo. 218; Reed v. Pelletier, 28 Mo. 173-177; Whitney v. Ferris, 10 Johns. 66; Buckman v.…
1Opinion of the CourtDryden, Judge
Howell sued Coshow on a note in the St. Charles Circuit Court, and served the summons by copy at his usual place of abode, left with a white member of his family over the age *122of fifteen years. Afterwards an attachment in aid was issued based upon two grounds:
1. “ That the defendant had absconded or absented himself from his usual place of abode in this State, so that the ordinary process of law could not be served on him.”
2. “ That the defendant had fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property or effects, so as to hinder or delay his creditors in collecting their demands against him.”
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Skelton v. BrewsterNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Merle & Co. v. HascallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Assessment of Collateral Inheritance Tax in Estate of LankfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
- Kinzel v. West Park Investment CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Flanagan v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Center v. McQuestenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Hedden v. SchneblinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.