Legal Opinion

Twin City Co-Op Credit Union v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 30, 1963No. 38,835PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal involves the liability of the defendant who, along with others, signed notes given to the plaintiff credit union. The defendant contends that the defense of usury is available to him because he is a nonmember of the credit union payee, and that the rate of interest specified in the agree- menis is usurious except as to loans made to members. The plaintiff credit union contends that the defendant is liable as a guarantor.

In its complaint the credit union alleged nine causes of action, each based upon a note in which the defendant James…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Clark v. Otto B. Ashbach & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. Citizens State Bank of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Merrimack Sheet Metal, Inc. v. Liv-Mar, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. In re HarstadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. ChristisonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API