Wilson v. Leo
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from orders vacating the service of summons and granting a motion to dismiss an action. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles Lantz, W. J. Wood, and Davis, Lantz & Wood, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The complaint herein was filed and summons issued on October 31, 1908. On August 22, 1911, plaintiff Lantz filed and presented his affidavit upon which, in accordance with his prayer, the court made an order directing that service cf summons be made by the publication thereof. Affidavit of publication was made and filed October 31, 1911. Thereafter, and more than three years after the filing of the complaint, defendant moved to quash the service of summons so made by publication and dismiss the action, the ground therefor, among others, being the insufficiency of the affidavit upon which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rue v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kahn v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bonelli v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Sanford v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Behymer v. SchraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Kelly v. FerbracheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Cahn v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.