Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Spilman v. California Highway Patrol

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1989No. A043726Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

This appeal concerns the proper construction of Vehicle Code section 22651, subdivision (o).1 For the following reasons, we agree with the construction urged by respondent, Jack Spilman, and affirm.

On March 2, 1988, a California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer removed Spilman’s 1959 Peterbilt dump truck from a public highway pursuant to section 22651, subdivision (o).2 Subsequently, CHP issued a notice to appear for the registration violation. Spilman posted bail, as required by the notice, forfeited bail, and demanded release of the vehicle pursuant to subdivision (o).3 CHP…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richard Stypmann v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Henry v. General Forming, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. People v. GopalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Pyne v. MeeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API