Legal Opinion
Pyne v. Meese
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1985No. Civ. 23926PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, Acting P. J.
Plaintiffs brought an action under 42 United States Code section 1983 against defendants, various local and state agencies and their representatives. The trial court granted defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in granting the motions and in awarding attorney fees and costs. We will affirm the judgments.
Facts
In July 1982, plaintiffs received notice from the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) that registration fees in the amounts of $100 and $45 were due on their horse trailer and Volkswagen, respectively.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Summers v. City of Cathedral CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- California Coastal Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bouvia v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Greene v. Friend of the Court, Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.