Legal Opinion

Bohlinger v. Abbott

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 9, 2021No. 20-1166Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

20-1166 Bohlinger v. Abbott UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Mary C. Quaratino v. Tiffany & Co., Michael Eiring, and David WrightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Ya-Chen Chen v. City University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. Robert Roge v. Nyp Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Deep Woods Holdings, L.L.C. v. Savings Deposit Insurance Fund of theCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API