Legal Opinion

Ingram Land Co. v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 16, 1925No. 6 Div. 348PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was an equitable action, on the common counts. Form 10, Code 1907, p. 1195. The general issue was pleaded and special pleas 3 and 4, to which demurrers were sustained.

The substance of plea 3 was that defendant was in the real estate business, and Dean listed with it for sale his house and lot, and defendant procured plaintiff to enter into the written contract (exhibited) of sale and purchase with Dean. It is averred that defendant “accepted as per the terms of contract above set out the $250 as purchase money as-the agent of W. R. Dean, and that the said W. R. Dean complied with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Upchurch v. NorsworthySupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. Gulf City Construction Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Thompson v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  5. Huffman v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cassimus v. Vaughn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Bell-Carns Realty Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Ingram Land Company v. T. A. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API