Legal Opinion

Ingram Land Company v. T. A. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1928No. 6 Div. 172PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The decisions in Ingram Land Co. v. Moore, 213 Ala. 19, 104 So. 134, and Gulf City Const. Co. v. L. & N. R. Co., 121 Ala. 621, 25 So. 579, on which was rested the decision in Ingram Land Co. v. Moore, 213 Ala. 19, 104 So. 134, were' modified in Cassimus v. Vaughn Realty Co., 217 Ala. 561, 117 So. 180.

Whether or not, under the evidence and Dean’s pleas, he should have been given the affirmative charge under the foregoing authority, it is not necessary to declare. He and the Ingram Land Company have made common cause by their pleadings and joint request for affirmative instruction, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gulf City Construction Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Cassimus v. Vaughn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Ingram Land Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell-Carns Realty Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API