Legal Opinion
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 31, 1992No. Civ. A. 89-1543 (SSB)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court are the following partial summary judgment motions:
1) plaintiff Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. (“Chemical Leaman”) moves that this court find:
a) that the cleanup costs which it is obligated to pay pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) with respect to ground and surface water contamination in the vicinity of its Bridgeport, New Jersey facility constitute “damages” on account of “property damage” within the meaning of the relevant insurance policies issued by defendants; and
b)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Nos. 97-5735, 97-5736Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- No. 93-5777, 93-5794Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.