Legal Opinion

New Bell Jellico Coal Co. v. Oxendine

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 19, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Bell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

The appellee, Slierman Oxendine, "being in the employ of the appellant, New Bell Jellico Coal Company, at its coal mine in Bell county, was put at the work of weighing coal at its tipple, a small frame building, situated several hundred feet from the mine at the end of a straight, steep, double railway track leading down a hill from the mouth of the mine. Coal is removed from the mine in cars containing from 2,000 to 4,000 pounds each. The loaded cars are placed at the head end of one of the double tracks against a contrivance known as a “barney”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Oliver Bros. & HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Louisville & Nashville Ry. Co. v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. CrutcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. McFarland v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Gibraltar Coal Mining Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Whitney Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. Whitney Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API