Scroggins v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1ConcurrenceDixon, Judge
While this court is required to reverse the trial court under existing law, I agree with Judge Jones’s concurring opinion and write separately only to express my frustration with the necessary outcome. Moreover, I fear the possible far-reaching implications of the current state of the law. Dismissal of Scroggins’s indictment due purely to an unintended technical violation is a harsh enough reality. But what if we were required to order the dismissal of a charge for the sexual assault of a child, or the dismissal of charges against an alleged serial killer due solely to a technical error which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BrowningMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. Sephus, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Pethel v. McBrideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
- Runck v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Gillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.