DAVIS THROUGH DAVIS v. Hartford Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal by plaintiff Davis from a summary judgment entered in favor of Hartford Insurance Company of Illinois, Inc. (Hartford), defendant in Davis's action, which claimed, among other things, that he was covered as a "relative" as that term is used in the uninsured motorists coverage of Hartford's policy of insurance issued to Davis's father. We affirm.
Plaintiff, Mack Davis III, is the son of Mack Davis, Jr., and Shelia Davis. They were married in Bessemer in January 1972, and thereafter they moved to Beloit, Wisconsin, and then to Rockford, Illinois. They had two children, Tomika…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Routt v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Schurler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Van Overbeke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Country Mutual Insurance v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Bartholet v. BerknessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
- American Economy Ins. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Cotton v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Kruger Commodities, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & GuarantyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.