Commonwealth v. Hoppin
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
There is no attempt by the Commonwealth to deny that the prosecutor, who is not counsel on this appeal, engaged in egregiously improper conduct during the closing argument. The question is: Did it matter?
Trial was before a jury and the defendant was convicted of rape, committing unnatural acts, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, kidnapping, unlawful possession of a firearm, unlawful possession of marijuana, and *37receiving stolen goods. On appeal, the major issue related to the charge of rape. The victim had testified that the defendant had tied her wrists together with a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. BorodineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. EarltopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. GallisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. ShelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HoppinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. NicholsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. NolMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995