Legal Opinion

Bourgeois v. Pentec Health, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 4, 2025No. 4:23-cv-06375Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PENNY BOURGEOIS, Case No. 23-cv-06375-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION TO REMAND 10 PENTEC HEALTH, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 58 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Pentec 14 Health, Inc., Dkt. No. 43, and a motion to remand filed by Plaintiff Penny Bourgeois, Dkt. No. 58. 15 The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters 16 are deemed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API