Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sherman v. Sherman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 2004No. WD 61208Published

1ConcurrenceEdwin H. Smith, Chief Judge

While I concur with the result reached by Judge Howard in the majority opinion as to all three points of error raised by the appellant, I write to clarify and expand on the rationale for the result reached in Point I, concerning the issue of imputation of income to the appellant in determining the trial court’s award of child support, and in general, to clarify and expand on the law of imputation.1

*390In Point I, the appellant claims that the trial court erred in awarding the respondent child support, as calculated pursuant to the court’s own Form 14 worksheets, based, in part, on imputed gross…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Steward v. GoetzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Kinzenbaw v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Gray v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API