Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Martin

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 15, 2017No. 16-4289PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. '

Richard Martin appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania that denied his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Martin claimed he was entitled to a lesser sentence because of Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines or USSG), but the District Court disagreed because Martin was a career offender. We agree with the District Court that Martin’s status as a career offender meant that he was not eligible for a reduced sentence.

I

A

Martin pleaded guilty…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Tyrone DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Ernest AkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API