United States v. Richard Martin
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. '
Richard Martin appeals an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania that denied his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Martin claimed he was entitled to a lesser sentence because of Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines or USSG), but the District Court disagreed because Martin was a career offender. We agree with the District Court that Martin’s status as a career offender meant that he was not eligible for a reduced sentence.
I
A
Martin pleaded guilty…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Tyrone DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Ernest AkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018