Legal Opinion
United States v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 27, 2011No. 09-2575PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Cornell Smith appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Upon examination of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, the panel agrees unanimously that oral.argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). For the reasons that follow, • we vacate the district court’s order and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
After he was indicted for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute over 1…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. David Lee OliverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Terry L. PevelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Mark MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Ricky DixonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Tyrone DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.