Sentell v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Justice.
Since the evidence shows that the defendant did not commit the act itself, in order for him to be convicted the evidence must connect him with the crime upon the theory of conspiracy, which is "a corrupt agreement between two or more persons to do an unlawful act.” Fincher v. State, 211 Ga. 89 (4) (84 SE2d 76); Park v. State, 224 Ga. 467, 473 (162 SE2d 359).
Proof of conspiracy is required for the admission of the testimony of Stansell as to the declarations, regarding directions to the decedent’s home, allegedly made to him by the defendant’s wife, who was the one who…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chappell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Park v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- Redwine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Fincher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- McCluskey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
3Cited by12 opinions
- Woodruff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Elam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Muckle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Woodall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.