Legal Opinion

Elam v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1972No. 46795PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

1. It must be observed that the district attorney representing the State in this case did not assist the court by filing a brief on behalf of his client whom he is ostensibly representing in this court. The court considers it to be the duty of a district attorney to do so — both as a representative of the people and as an officer of this court. The Clerk of the Court of Appeals, by direction of the court, requested in writing that a brief be filed but the request was not honored. We must…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Pruitt v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Fortune v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Redwine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. State v. AbrahamsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Boyd v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Bogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API