Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1990No. 8917SC623PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the admission of testimony from the victim that he had pleaded guilty to two counts of taking indecent liberties with the victim in 1985. The trial judge, in ruling on defendant’s motion to suppress those convictions, found that the 1985 and 1988 events involved the same victim and occurred in the same bedroom. He also found and concluded that the 1985 events were not too remote in time from the 1988 event since the defendant had been imprisoned for some time less than one year following his October 1985 conviction and did not return to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. AgualloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. ShaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. HuangCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API