Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance v. Ozburn

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1930No. 20304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

Where error is assigned in a petition for certiorari upon a ruling based on a motion for a new trial, and the grounds of the motion are set forth in the petition, a general assignment of error, that the court erred in so ruling, is sufficient. The petition in this case sets out literally the grounds of the motion for a new trial, and does thus “fully and distinctly sét forth the errors complained of.” The first headnote in Crouch v. Spooner, 8 Ga. App. 626 (69 S. E. 1129), is as follows: “Where the error alleged is in the granting or denying of a new trial, one assignment of error is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Huxford v. Southern Pine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Reese v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Rigell v. SirmansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Butler, Stevens & Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Gray v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Lovett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Ozburn v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API