National Union Fire Insurance v. Ozburn
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
Where error is assigned in a petition for certiorari upon a ruling based on a motion for a new trial, and the grounds of the motion are set forth in the petition, a general assignment of error, that the court erred in so ruling, is sufficient. The petition in this case sets out literally the grounds of the motion for a new trial, and does thus “fully and distinctly sét forth the errors complained of.” The first headnote in Crouch v. Spooner, 8 Ga. App. 626 (69 S. E. 1129), is as follows: “Where the error alleged is in the granting or denying of a new trial, one assignment of error is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Huxford v. Southern Pine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Reese v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Rigell v. SirmansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Butler, Stevens & Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Gray v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Lovett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Ozburn v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936