Legal Opinion

Butler, Stevens & Co. v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1910No. 2318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Illegality; from city court of Nashville — Judge Buie. September 22, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. It is too well settled to question or to require any citation of authority that a general assignment of error, excepting to a judgment overruling and denying a motion for a new trial, is sufficiently specific to bring under review all the grounds of error jiroperly made in the motion for a new trial. The motion to dismiss the -writ of error is without merit.

2. Two defendants were sued jointly as the makers of a promissory note. The defendant first named in the suit filed a plea of non est factum, which, by consent of plaintiff, was sustained. The other defendant was duly served, but did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bedingfield v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reese v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Murphey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Rivers v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Glisson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API