Legal Opinion

Housing Authority of East Hartford v. Morales

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 27, 2001No. AC 21321PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff in this summary process action, the housing authority of the town of East Hartford, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of possession. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly ordered (1) a stay of execution of the judgment, and (2) use and occupancy payments in an improper amount. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.1

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the plaintiffs appeal. In April, 1998, the parties entered into a lease agreement whereby the defendant, Mayra Morales, leased from the plaintiff a unit at one of the plaintiffs…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Santoro v. SantoroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  2. Hoye v. Dewolfe Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Pac v. AlthamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doe v. BemerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. Lawrence v. CordsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. BennettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. CaldrelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. RozbickiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API