Gaffney v. Coffey
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
It is conceded that the testatrix had sufficient mental capacity to make a will and that the will was executed with legal formality. The single contention of the appelant is that the will was the product of undue influence exerted over the testatrix by the son. The appelee, on the other hand, claims that the will was the voluntary act of the mother, prompted only by her own dissatisfaction with Mamie’s conduct in accepting the attentions of Pappachristo. Such displeasure on the part of the mother is conceded. The sole question, therefore, raised by the appelee’s motion for a directed verdict…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitman v. MoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
- Spilene v. Salmon Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920
- Albee v. OsgoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
- Loveren v. EatonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
- Edgerly v. EdgerlySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Trepanier v. Mercantile Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Daley v. Judge of ProbateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
- In re Estate of ColantonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024