Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Floyd

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 30, 2007No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 31, September Term, 2006PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule lG-TSRa), 1 filed a petition for disciplinary or remedial action against Respondent, Angela Therese Floyd, on August 30, 2006, in which Bar Counsel alleged that Respondent violated Maryland Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(c) (Misconduct) 2 when, during an employment application process for a legal position, in order to secure a higher salary, she acted intentionally to deceive the Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) into believing that she and her husband had a “purely”…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Parish v. Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API