McLaughlin v. Chadwell
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. From the Circuit Court, September Term, 1871. Nathaniel Baxter, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The question presented in these cases is as to the legality of the taxes assessed for State, county and municipal purposes, against the stock owned by the parties in the national banks of Nashville. The act of Congress in regard to national banks, approved *390June, 1864, contains the following proviso: “That nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent all the shares in any of the said associations, held by any person or body corporate, from being included in the valuation of the personal property of such person or corporation, in the assessment of taxes imposed by or under State authority,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Van Allen v. AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- People v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Austin v. the AldermenSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Lionberger v. RouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Harvester Company v. CarrTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
- Southern Express Co. v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
- Exchange National Bank v. MillerUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
- R. Moore & Co. v. State InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1875
- State Insurance v. GennettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.