Legal Opinion

Exchange National Bank v. Miller

United States Circuit Court

Decided February 7, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Chancery.

1Opinion of the CourtSage, J.

The tax from which the complainant prays to be relieved was assessed on the duplicate of 1882, under the following sections of the Revised Statutes of Ohio:

“Sec. 2765. The cashier of each incorporated bank shall make out and return to tiie auditor of the county in which it is located, between the first and second Monday of May, annually, a report in duplicate, under oath, exhibiting, in detail, and under appropriate heads, the resources and liabilities of such bank at the close of business on the Wednesday next preceding said second Monday, together with a full statement of the names and…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Van Allen v. AssessorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hannan v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  2. Charleston Nat. Bank v. MeltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1909
  3. First National Bank v. ProvinceMontana Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API