State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vesper
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The plaintiff planned to widen its highway and condemned a ten-foot strip across the front of the lot of defendants Bernard A. Grace and Winifred R. Grace. It appeals from the $4,260 verdict and judgment.
The plaintiff first contends the trial court erred in excluding its evidence of special benefits to the defendants’ lot, bestowed by plaintiff’s installing a sanitary sewer line that replaced the defendants’ septic sewer system. The issue is this: Assuming the plaintiff was entitled to show special benefits accruing to the defendants’ lot by affording them a sanitary…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bertram v. WunningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vorhof-Duenke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Kinzel v. West Park Investment CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Franklin v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galovich v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- City of Jackson v. BarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Blue Ridge Baptist Temple, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State ex rel. Department of Highways v. HaapanenNevada Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.