Legal Opinion

Lund v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1962No. A-8607PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner was appellant in the Court of Civil Appeals. His appeal was dismissed by that court because of his failure timely to file a motion for new trial. 348 S.W. 2d 247. In his petition for writ of error he asserts that the judgment of the trial court is void and that the entry of a void judgment is fundamental error which may be raised on appeal without the necessity of complying with the applicable Rules of Civil Procedure for the filing of a motion for new trial. We do not agree.

This case was tried to a jury and no exception to the necessity for the timely filing of a motion for new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. F. Jones & Sons v. Republic Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Lund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Florance v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  2. Continental Casualty Company v. StreetTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Narmah v. Waller Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  4. Moreno v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Snavely v. SnavelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API