Defenders of Wildlife v. Ballard
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARQUEZ, Senior District Judge.
Now fully briefed and pending before this Court are the parties’ crossmotions for summary judgment which the parties agree will fully dispose of this action. Unfortunately before the Court can turn to the merits of the motions, it must once again address the scope of the action. As previously described, the Complaint is as follows:
Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunc-tive relief under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). Plaintiffs charge…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. BrownleeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
- Atwell v. KW Plastics Recycling DivisionDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Maryland Native Plant Society v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Utah Council, Trout Unlimited v. United States Army Corp. of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.