Legal Opinion

Starr v. Kaiser

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Multnomah: John B. Cdeland, Judge. Suit by Nannie N. Starr against Kate M. Kaiser and another. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant Kaiser appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

On November 25, 1899, the plaintiff commenced a suit against William L. Starr, her husband, for separate support, and on February 20, 1900, obtained a decree against him for $35 per month, dating from the commencement of the suit, and to continue while he remained separate and apart from her, or *171until the further order of the court, which decree was docketed two days later. On July 14,1899, Starr and plaintiff executed and delivered to the Associated Banking & Trust Co. a writing, in form a quitclaim deed to lots 5 and 6 in block 129, Caruther’s Addition to Portland, hereinafter referred to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MarshallOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ladd v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Marshall v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Kinney v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Kollock v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. First Nat. Bank v. CourtrightOregon Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API