Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Williams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeaN, J.

This is a suit to declare a deed, absolute in form, to be a mortgage, and for leave to redeem. On January 11, 1884, plaintiff’s intestate, George Marshall, being indebted to his sister, the defendant, in the sum of $15,203.13, as evidenced by two promissory notes for $9,000 and $6,203.13, bearing interest at the rate of nine and ten per cent per annum, respectively, as security therefor, conveyed to her by absolute deed one hundred acres of land near St. Johns in Multnomah county, and two lots in Conch’s addition to the city of Portland. On June 17, *2691887, no payments having been made on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Odell v. . MontrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Shattuck v. . BascomNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walner v. CapronIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Ferguson v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Clambey v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Lovejoy v. ChapmanOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Marx v. La RocqueOregon Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API