In Re Corcoran
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The problem presented by this petition is controlled by our recent decisions in In re Estrada, 63 Cal.2d 740 [48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948], and in In re Daup, 63 Cal.2d 754 [48 Cal.Rptr. 181, 408 P.2d 957], It was there held that the 1963 amendments to Penal Code sections 4530 and 3044 and the repeal of section 4531 of that code must be held applicable to any case not reduced to final judgment at the time of their passage. The admitted facts of the present case bring it within the ambit of these cases, and the Attorney General so concedes.
On July 22, 1957, petitioner pleaded guilty to a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re DaupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FrahsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. EsquivelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- In Re FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re RingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.