In Re Ring
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This petition presents the same problem involved in our recent decisions in In re Estrada, 63 Cal.2d 740 [48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948], and in In re Daup, 63 Cal.2d 754 [48 Cal.Rptr. 181, 408 P.2d 957], It was held in those eases that limited retroactive effect should be given to the 1963 amendments to the Penal Code mitigating the punishment for escapes committed without force or violence.
As in the case of In re Corcoran (ante, p. 447 [50 Cal.Rptr. 529, 413 P.2d 129]), this day decided, the Attorney General concedes that the amendments in question are applicable to the facts of this case.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- In re ShippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re SterlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re DaupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FrahsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. RossiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. TappUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.