Legal Opinion
Skupienski v. Maly
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 12, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
47 N.J. Super. 409 (1957)
136 A.2d 41
BERTHA SKUPIENSKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK MALY AND ANN MALY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued August 12, 1957.
Decided November 12, 1957.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, WAESCHE and KNIGHT.
Mr. Charles Blume argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Benjamin Yanowsky, attorney).
Mr. Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Wilbur A. Stevens, attorney; Mr. Donald B. Connolly and Mr. Schiffman, on the brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
Plaintiff instituted an action to recover…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Stanley Co. of America v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co. of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Saco v. HallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Brody v. Albert Lifson & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Skupienski v. MalySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- DeRobertis v. RandazzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- DeRobertis v. RandazzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983