Legal Opinion

Vadnal v. Krsul-Kutchel Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1942No. Appeal, 275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case we have an appeal by the insurance carrier, on its own behalf and that of the employer, from the judgment entered by the court below upon an award of compensation to the claimant, Jane Vadnal, made by the referee and affirmed by the board, upon the basis that her fifty-eight year old husband, Matthew Vadnal, a coal digger and loader in a mine of the defendant employer, Krsul-Kutchel Coal Company, on December 6, 1935, sustained an injury by an accident (within the meaning of Section 301 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. Vandervort & CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Kasman v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Gasperin v. Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Cubit v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karoly v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Forsythe v. Harrison Twp. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Fry v. Calcite Quarry Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API