Legal Opinion
United States v. Ellis E. Neder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 10, 1999No. 92-2929PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court, for us to consider in the first instance whether the district court’s failure to instruct the jury on materiality as an element of the federal mail fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, and 1344, respectively, was harmless error. 1 Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 1841, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999), affg in part and rev’g in part, 136 F.3d 1459 (1998). After review, we conclude that the failure to instruct on materiality…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Osama Musa AlferahinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. David E. MartinelliCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. TakhalovCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.