Legal Opinion

Ex parte F.F.A.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 21, 2005No. 10-05-00254-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

F.F.A. appeals an order dismissing “as frivolous or malicious” his petition for ex-punction under Chapter 55 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.1 When F.F.A. filed his notice of appeal, he simultaneously filed a “Motion and Affidavit In Forma Pauperis.” He has since filed a motion for permission to appeal with this Court, alleging that he “was found not indigent” by the trial court.

In response to this latter motion, the Clerk of this Court directed the district clerk to file a limited record to determine whether F.F.A. is entitled to proceed without advance payment of costs.2 See In re…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  2. In Re ArroyoTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In the interest of J.W.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Thomas v. Olympus/Nelson Property Management, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Ffa, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. Guy Grantham v. Racefab, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API