Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grotefend Haun

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1924No. Appeals, 26 and 27PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The defendants were indicted on six counts charging, 1st. — Manufacturing intoxicating liquor, 2d. — Selling, 3d.' — Furnishing, 4th. — Transporting, 5th. — Possessing, 6th. — Conspiracy to manufacture, sell and offer for sale, furnish, transport and possessing intoxicating'liquors for beverage purposes. The Standard Brewing Company was a corporation having its place of business at New Castle.. One of the defendants, Haun, was its secretary and treasurer, the other Grotefend was brewmaster and superintendent. The Commonwealth showed that there was beer containing an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. McCue v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  3. Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  5. Billingsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. FioriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API