Legal Opinion

Pirone v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*432Defendants met their burden of showing that the requested records relating to plaintiffs hepatitis are relevant to a physical condition that plaintiff placed “in controversy” through his deposition testimony (Dillenbeck v Hess, 73 NY2d 278, 287 [1989]). Furthermore, the records relating to plaintiffs depression were relevant. Plaintiff alleged that because of defendants’ conduct, he suffered physical injuries that has resulted in him spending “everyday or at least part of everyday from the date of the accident confined to his bed and home” (see id.). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Sweeny, Catterson,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dillenbeck v. HessNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walters v. SallahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Almonte v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Kaparic v. 309 E. 5 St. LLCAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  4. Walters v. SallahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API